Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2026
Adolescent Acceptability of School and Home Micronutrient Supplementation and Nutrition Curriculum in Mozambique.
Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron-deficiency anemia is the most common micronutrient deficiency and a leading cause of disability-adjusted life years among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) globally. Although multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) provides a broader range of micronutrients than iron-folic acid supplementation (IFAS) prior to conception, the acceptability of MMS and home-based supplementation strategies remains underexplored. We assessed the acceptability of MMS, IFAS, and a contextualized nutrition curriculum delivered via school clubs in a two-arm cluster-randomized trial across three rural secondary schools in Monapo District, Mozambique. Fourteen teachers (clusters) were randomized to deliver either weekly school-based IFAS or daily home-based MMS. A total of 492 AGYW aged 13-20 years were enrolled (240 IFAS; 252 MMS); both arms received the same nutrition curriculum. Participants in both arms reported increased energy, improved appetite, and relief from menstrual symptoms. IFAS was significantly more acceptable than MMS for smell, and some participants perceived the once-weekly IFAS regimen as less burdensome than daily MMS. Some AGYW also reported that male peers perceived MMS as birth control, or assumed the girls were pregnant, due to the image of a pregnant woman on the pill bottle. Ratings of the nutrition curriculum and teachers' facilitation were positive in both arms. Participants generally preferred the regimen they were assigned, and family support facilitated adherence. These findings suggest home-based supplementation may be a feasible and acceptable strategy for reaching in-school and out-of-school AGYW in Mozambique. Including boys in future interventions and redesigning the MMS label could help reduce misconceptions and enhance acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.