Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318617›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Toward a Unified Mechanistic Understanding of Polymer Electrolytes for Advanced Solid-State Batteries.

Jing Chen, Han Chen, Michel Armand, Gunther Brunklaus, Jang Wook Choi, Yan-Bing He, Bumjoon J Kim, Seung Woo Lee, Stefano Passerini, Meera Mohankumar and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jing ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Han ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michel ArmandCentre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-9233
Gunther BrunklausHelmholtz Institute Münster (IMD-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-1383
Jang Wook ChoiSchool of Chemical and Biological Engineering and Institute of Chemical Process, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-0901
Yan-Bing HeShenzhen All-Solid-State Lithium Battery Electrolyte Engineering Research Center, Institute of Materials Research (IMR), Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-5498
Bumjoon J KimDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Seung Woo LeeGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Stefano PasseriniHelmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Ulm, Germany.
Meera MohankumarDepartment of Radiation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Patrick TheatoSoft Matter Synthesis Laboratory - Institute for Biological Interfaces III (IBG-3), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-9254
Marnix WagemakerDepartment of Radiation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-1044
Martin WinterHelmholtz Institute Münster (IMD-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Münster, Germany.
Qiang ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Complex Solid-State Batteries, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shujiang DingSchool of Chemistry, Engineering Research Center of Energy Storage Materials and Devices of Ministry of Education, National Innovation Platform (Center) for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-0973
Zhiqun LinDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-9340

Funding

German Research Foundation (DFG) 390874152International Electrochemical Energy Storage Research Institute (IEES), Nanjing Normal University 1840800014Minstry of Education (MOE), Singapore MOE-T2EP10223-0001Minstry of Education (MOE), Singapore MOE-T2EP50123-0010National Natural Science Foundation of China 52273081National Natural Science Foundation of China 52433002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer electrolytes (PEs) are widely regarded as a promising platform for solid-state batteries (SSBs), offering the potential to simultaneously achieve high energy density with improved safety. However, in current literature, PEs spanning liquid-percolated gels, liquid-assisted quasi-solids, and truly polymer-governed solids are often indiscriminately grouped as solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), obscuring their distinct ion transport mechanisms, interfacial behaviors, and practical performance constraints, and leading to misleading performance comparisons and unrealistic expectations regarding solid-state operation. Herein, we establish a mechanistic framework that categorizes PEs into gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs), quasi-solid polymer electrolytes (QSPEs), and all-solid polymer electrolytes (ASPEs) based on their dominant ion-solvation environment and transport pathways. By systematically analyzing the ion-transport mechanisms, interfacial behaviors, and performance-limiting features associated with each PE class, we clarify their defining characteristics and mechanism-imposed limitations. Accordingly, we outline category-specific research priorities and highlight the necessity of mechanism-driven materials design, transparent definitions and reporting, and application-relevant benchmarking. This unified Perspective lays a foundation for consistent interpretation, meaningful comparison across PE systems, and more rational materials design toward the advancement of PE-enabled SSBs.

Indexed as

benchmarkingion transportpolymer electrolytes

Identifiers

PMID42318617
PMCPMC13411047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.