ArticleElectrochimica acta2026
Review of Materials for Engineering and Design of 3D-Printed Electrochemical Sensors.
Article in Electrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is increasingly used to build electrochemical sensing platforms because it allows researchers to create complex geometries, combine multiple functional components in a single device, and adjust sensor designs to suit specific analytical applications. In this context, fused filament fabrication (FFF) has gained increasing attention for its ability to use conductive thermoplastic filaments and its suitability for rapid design iterations. This review summarizes recent research on electrochemical sensors produced by FFF printing, emphasizing how factors such as printing parameters, filament composition, post-printing processes, and device design affect electrochemical performance. The discussion also addresses ongoing issues with reproducibility, surface accessibility, and inconsistencies in reported performance. In addition, the review considers a range of routinely employed approaches to enhance electrode performance, including mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical activation, and stresses the importance of achieving an appropriate trade-off between sensitivity, stability, and other practical constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.