ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Hostile work climate: gender barriers in the European energy R&I workforce.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving climate neutrality by 2050 demands a fundamental transformation of the energy sector, which currently accounts for 76.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Meeting these targets requires attention not only to the green technologies produced by research and innovation (R&I), but also to who drives these innovations and under what working conditions. Despite progress made over recent decades, women remain systematically underrepresented in the energy sector, owing to deeply rooted structural dynamics: male-dominated organizational cultures, recruitment and evaluation processes shaped by gender bias, and professional climates that hinder women's full participation and career advancement. This study examines the R&I workforce in the energy sector, a domain in which gender imbalances have thus far received limited scholarly attention. A cross-national survey was conducted among employees of European public and private universities and research organizations, structured around sociographic and professional variables, organizational context variables, and four validated psychometric scales-Work-Related Quality of Life, Perceived Subtle Gender Bias Index, Just Energy Transition Knowledge Production, and Workplace Diversity Climate-comprising a total of 43 items. The data enabled examination of: i) perceptions regarding institutional support for women's career trajectories and the handling of both overt inequalities and implicit biases; ii) everyday workplace practices, such as professional recognition, empowerment, and well-being, as key determinants in fostering a genuine commitment to sustainability. Methodologically, the latent structure of the 43 items was identified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, yielding nine composite factors subsequently used to perform a cluster analysis. The results identify two contrasting profiles: a Critical Cluster, predominantly female, in which the working environment is perceived as hostile and gender discrimination manifests in multiple forms, including implicit bias, verbal harassment, and inadequate support for work-life balance; and a Neutral Cluster, predominantly male and concentrated in the renewable energy, characterized by a more positive assessment of the organizational climate and limited awareness of gender stereotypes and discriminatory practices. This polarization calls into question the inclusivity and equity of the current R&I system in the energy sector. The study provides an empirical contribution to the debate on inclusive energy transitions and puts forward policy recommendations to strengthen gender equity measures within R&I organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.