Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318546›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Comprehensive evaluation of a deep learning-based synthetic CT model for MR-only radiotherapy across multiple anatomical sites.

Xiao Liang, Chanwoong Lee, Andrew Godley, Junjie Wu, Mu-Han Lin, Trung Truong, Weiguo Lu, Viktor Iakovenko, Steve Jiang, Jie Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiao LiangDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chanwoong LeeMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrew GodleyMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Junjie WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, NY, USA.
Mu-Han LinMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Trung TruongMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Weiguo LuMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Viktor IakovenkoMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Steve JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jie DengMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: With advances in deep learning, MRI-only radiotherapy planning (MROP) has been increasingly adopted. However, clinical implementation still requires rigorous evaluation of synthetic CT (sCT) accuracy across multiple anatomical sites.This study aimed to develop and evaluate an all-sites deep learning model for generating sCT from MRI across the head and neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and spine, with comprehensive assessment of image similarity, dose/volume metric fidelity, and patient positioning accuracy. Methods: A modified weakly-supervised learning model was trained to generate sCT, incorporating bone-specific and bladder-specific loss term to improve sCT accuracy. Evaluation included: 1. image similarity analysis between sCT and CT using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) of Hounsfield Units (HU); 2. dose/volume metric accuracy assessment by recalculating clinical plans on sCT and comparing dose distribution and dose-volume histogram metrics with those calculated on CT; 3. positioning accuracy assessment, including translational and rotational differences, based on rigid CBCT-to-CT versus CBCT-to-sCT registration. Results: The average MAE in HU was lowest in soft-tissue regions and highest in bone. Across all sites, planning target volume mean dose differences between CT- and sCT-based plans were < 1 Gy. Gamma passing rates exceeded 95% under 2 mm/2% criteria for all regions excluding thorax. Positioning accuracy was highest in head&neck and spine, whereas the abdomen and pelvis regions showed greater variability due to soft-tissue motion and MRI-related artifacts. Conclusions: The all-sites sCT model achieved clinically acceptable image quality, dose/volume metric accuracy, and alignment performance across multiple anatomical regions.

Indexed as

Dose calculation accuracyImage similarityMR-only radiotherapy planningMulti-site evaluationPatient positioning accuracysynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID42318546
PMCPMC13273862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.