ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Comprehensive evaluation of a deep learning-based synthetic CT model for MR-only radiotherapy across multiple anatomical sites.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: With advances in deep learning, MRI-only radiotherapy planning (MROP) has been increasingly adopted. However, clinical implementation still requires rigorous evaluation of synthetic CT (sCT) accuracy across multiple anatomical sites.This study aimed to develop and evaluate an all-sites deep learning model for generating sCT from MRI across the head and neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and spine, with comprehensive assessment of image similarity, dose/volume metric fidelity, and patient positioning accuracy. Methods: A modified weakly-supervised learning model was trained to generate sCT, incorporating bone-specific and bladder-specific loss term to improve sCT accuracy. Evaluation included: 1. image similarity analysis between sCT and CT using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) of Hounsfield Units (HU); 2. dose/volume metric accuracy assessment by recalculating clinical plans on sCT and comparing dose distribution and dose-volume histogram metrics with those calculated on CT; 3. positioning accuracy assessment, including translational and rotational differences, based on rigid CBCT-to-CT versus CBCT-to-sCT registration. Results: The average MAE in HU was lowest in soft-tissue regions and highest in bone. Across all sites, planning target volume mean dose differences between CT- and sCT-based plans were < 1 Gy. Gamma passing rates exceeded 95% under 2 mm/2% criteria for all regions excluding thorax. Positioning accuracy was highest in head&neck and spine, whereas the abdomen and pelvis regions showed greater variability due to soft-tissue motion and MRI-related artifacts. Conclusions: The all-sites sCT model achieved clinically acceptable image quality, dose/volume metric accuracy, and alignment performance across multiple anatomical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.