ArticleMedComm2026
Safety and Efficacy of a Sandwich Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Strategy for Low-Risk Distal Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results From the TESS Phase II Trial.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03840239 (Total Neoadjuvant trEatment to Increase the Clinical Complete reSponse Rate for diStal Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Total Neoadjuvant trEatment to Increase the Clinical Complete reSponse Rate for diStal Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TESS)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective phase II multicenter study evaluated a novel sandwich total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) strategy for patients with relatively low-risk distal locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The regimen consisted of two cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) administrated before, during, and after radiotherapy, followed by surgery or a watch-and-wait strategy, and two cycles of adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the clinical complete response (cCR) rate. All 98 patients completed radiotherapy, and 88.8% received six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 46.9% of patients achieved cCR, 7.1% achieved near-clinical complete response (near-cCR), and 45.9% had non-clinical complete response (non-cCR). In the observed population, the complete response (CR), pathological complete response (pCR), and sphincter-preservation (SP) rates were 61.2%, 46.4%, and 79.6%, respectively. The local regrowth-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, and overall survival rates were 89.5%, 100%, 92.9%, and 96.9%, respectively. Overall, this sandwich TNT strategy achieved high rates of cCR, pCR, CR, and SP, with favorable survival outcomes and acceptable toxicity, suggesting a promising organ-preserving treatment approach for selected patients with distal LARC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03840239.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.