ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analytically map functional knee phenotypes (FKP) to the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification, evaluate CPAK's ability to represent native coronal alignment variability in non-osteoarthritic (NO) and osteoarthritic (OA) populations and propose a simplified translational framework between both systems. It was hypothesized that CPAK represents a discretized form of native coronal alignment and that its relationship with functional phenotypes is inherently probabilistic. Methods: Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity were analytically derived from femoral and tibial mechanical angles, enabling direct conversion of functional phenotypes into CPAK types. A theoretical cartography was constructed using mean values and full angular intervals (±1.5°). Four assignment strategies were applied: deterministic assignment, interval propagation, stochastic Monte Carlo simulation and least probable CPAK scenario. Conversions were performed in 308 NO and 2692 OA knees from the functional phenotype cohort and compared with 500 NO and 507 OA knees from the CPAK cohort. A synthetic bidimensional framework (Hirschmann-CPAK Translational grid [HCT-9]) was analytically derived. Results: Considering angular intervals, each functional phenotype corresponded to multiple CPAK types (mean 1.7 per phenotype), showing that deterministic conversion underestimated variability. In NO knees, distributions obtained using the mean, interval, stochastic and rare methods differed significantly from the original cohort (all Conclusion: The relationship between FKP and CPAK is inherently probabilistic. The HCT-9 framework enables structured translation between both systems and supports a shared alignment language for total knee arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.