Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318460›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Gut decisions based on the liver: prediction of colorectal neoplasia using AI-based liver analysis of routine CT scans.

Anna Hinterberger, Jonas Bohn, Darya Trofimova, Nicolas Knabe, Julia Dettling, Tobias Norajitra, Fabian Isensee, Johannes Betge, Stefan O Schönberg, Dominik Nörenberg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anna Hinterberger *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Jonas Bohn *Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Darya TrofimovaDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicolas KnabeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Julia DettlingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Tobias NorajitraDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian IsenseeDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes BetgeGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan O SchönbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Dominik NörenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Sergio GrosuDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sonja LogesGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Ralf FlocaDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology (TUD) Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Klaus Maier-Hein *Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Freba Grawe *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening offers an important opportunity to increase colonoscopy participation and reduce mortality. This study evaluates the potential of the gut-liver axis to predict colorectal neoplasia using artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of the liver in routine CT images as an opportunistic screening approach. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 1,997 patients were analyzed, including 1,189 without neoplasia and 808 with colorectal neoplasia (423 adenomas, 385 CRC). Radiomic features were extracted from three-dimensional liver segmentations, and the dataset was split into training (n = 1,397) and test (n = 600) cohorts. Five machine learning models were trained using five-fold cross-validation on the 20 most informative features. Results: The best-performing radiomics-based XGBoost model achieved a test AUROC of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.767-0.837), outperforming a clinical-only model (AUROC: 0.457). After threshold optimization, sensitivity reached 74.1% and specificity 72.3% for detecting colorectal neoplasia. Subclassification between CRC and adenoma was less accurate (AUROC: 0.674). Discussion: These findings demonstrate that AI-based liver analysis from routine CT scans can predict colorectal neoplasia, supporting its potential as an accessible adjunct to CRC screening and highlighting the gut-liver axis as a novel biomarker source.

Indexed as

colorectal neoplasiaCRC-screeninggut-liver-axispreventionRPTK

Identifiers

PMID42318460
PMCPMC13272017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.