Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318450›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026

Deployment of AI-driven automated quality control of whole-slide images in a large tertiary cancer center.

Kaitlyn Gelfant, Ali Manzo, Samiha Alam, Md Mushfiqur Rahman, K Hassan Bilal, Rushi Brahmabhatt, Suraj Nayak, Nitin Singhal, Dinesh Joshi, Evangelos Stamelos and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kaitlyn GelfantDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ali ManzoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Samiha AlamDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Md Mushfiqur RahmanDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
K Hassan BilalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rushi BrahmabhattAIRAMatrix Private Limited, Thane, MH, India.
Suraj NayakAIRAMatrix Private Limited, Thane, MH, India.
Nitin SinghalAIRAMatrix Private Limited, Thane, MH, India.
Dinesh JoshiAIRAMatrix Private Limited, Thane, MH, India.
Evangelos StamelosDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ishtiaque AhmedDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan AlarconDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mohit PasrichaDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maria PirgousisDigital Informatics & Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter NtiamoahDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ahmet DoganDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Meera HameedDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Orly ArdonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Quality control (QC) remains a major challenge in digital histopathology, as artifacts introduced during slide preparation and whole-slide imaging (WSI) can compromise diagnostic accuracy. Automated QC has emerged as a potential solution to the scalability and variability limitations of manual review in digital pathology workflows. However, there is limited evidence describing real-world, enterprise-scale implementation of automated QC systems within high-throughput clinical environments. Materials and methods: We evaluated the clinical implementation of a commercially available, AI-based automated QC platform (AIRAQc) within a large digital pathology lab. Feasibility testing included 60 histopathology slides scanned across 3 WSI platforms. Following enterprise integration, a retrospective operational analysis was performed on 94,995 WSIs generated over 1 month across 10 subspecialty services and multiple stain types. System performance, artifact prevalence, processing latency, reproducibility, and scalability were assessed using structured data exports, statistical analyses, and controlled load-testing scenarios. Results: Artifact detection demonstrated high reproducibility across scanner platforms, with tissue fold detection showing >97% concordance and air bubble detection exceeding 98% concordance. Scanning-related artifacts, including missing tissue and blurred regions, varied by scanner model but were consistently identified. Across the clinical deployment, the mean analysis time was 17 s/image, with no analysis failures observed during load testing. Mean total artifact burden/image was 1.91%, with most images meeting predefined QC thresholds. The system maintained stable performance under sustained high-throughput conditions, supporting daily volumes exceeding 6000 slides without workflow disruption. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasible deployment of an AI-based QC framework within a large-scale, multi-vendor clinical digital pathology environment. The QC framework enabled consistent assessment of routine WSIs with low per-image latency and sustained high-throughput scanning without workflow disruption. Consistent application of QC thresholds across a multi-instrument infrastructure reduced reliance on manual review and supports the integration of automated QC as a core component of contemporary digital pathology workflows.

Indexed as

AI image reviewAutomationClinical implementationQuality controlStandardizationWSI

Identifiers

PMID42318450
PMCPMC13273568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.