ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A plasma N-acetyl amino acid panel for type 2 diabetes discrimination built by targeted LC-MS/MS: A case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by profound metabolic disturbances, yet clinically actionable biomarkers beyond conventional glycaemic indices remain limited. N-acetyl amino acids (NAcAAs) are emerging metabolites linked to amino acid metabolism and acetylation status, but their quantitative profile and diagnostic relevance in T2D have not been systematically defined. Objectives: To characterize the plasma NAcAA profile in T2D using a targeted LC-MS/MS approach, to evaluate associations between individual NAcAAs and clinical traits, and to develop a metabolite-based panel for T2D discrimination. Methods: In this case-control study, we developed and validated a targeted LC-MS/MS assay for the absolute quantification of 19 plasma NAcAAs. The assay was applied to 174 individuals with T2D and 68 non-diabetic controls. Global metabolic differences were assessed by principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Associations between NAcAAs and clinical traits were examined by correlation analysis and multivariable logistic regression. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to construct a compact diagnostic signature. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: The plasma NAcAA landscape differed substantially between T2D and controls, with coordinated increases in metabolites such as N-acetyltryptophan and decreases in several others, including N-acetylproline, N-acetylglutamine, and N-acetyllysine. Differential NAcAAs were significantly associated with glycaemic traits, particularly fasting glucose and HbA1c, as well as renal-related markers including urea nitrogen and creatinine. In adjusted logistic regression models, N-acetyltryptophan was positively associated with T2D (OR = 9.452, 95% CI 4.421-20.211). In contrast, several NAcAAs showed inverse associations, including N-acetylproline (OR = 0.041, 95% CI 0.015-0.111) and N-acetyllysine (OR = 0.088, 95% CI 0.038-0.203). An 8-metabolite panel derived by LASSO achieved excellent discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.963, 95% CI 0.942-0.984), with good calibration and favorable net clinical benefit. Conclusion: Targeted quantitative profiling of plasma NAcAAs identifies a distinct metabolic signature associated with T2D. A compact NAcAA-based panel shows strong potential for T2D discrimination and may serve as a complementary tool for metabolic risk characterization and translational biomarker development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.