ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Hidden out-of-pocket spending on health: A cross-sectional study on underestimation of catastrophic health spending in Vietnam.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the extent to which excluding indirect out-of-pocket (OOP) spending leads to an underestimation of the incidence of catastrophic health spending (CHS) in Vietnam, where family members are responsible for essential in-hospital care, resulting in substantial indirect OOP spending. Study design: A cross-sectional retrospective facility-based survey. Methods: A total of 219 households with inpatient or outpatient members at Phu Tho Provincial General Hospital were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, to collect data on direct and indirect OOP spending and socioeconomic characteristics. Direct OOP spending was extracted from hospital billing records. The incidence of CHS was calculated using three thresholds: (i) spending >40% of non-food household expenditure (CHS40); (ii) spending >25% of total household expenditure (CHS25); and (iii) spending >10% of total household expenditure (CHS10). Results: Inclusion of indirect OOP spending significantly increased the incidence of CHS across the three thresholds. At the CHS40 threshold, the incidence increased from 15.1% (based on direct OOP spending only) to 31.1% after incorporating indirect OOP spending, a 2.06-fold increase. Similar trends were confirmed under the CHS25 and CHS10 thresholds. Key contributors to indirect OOP spending included health insurance premiums, meals for patients and caregivers, and transportation. Notably, 16.0% of households were categorized as experiencing CHS40 only when indirect spending was incorporated. These results highlight a substantial underestimation of financial burden under the current WHO and World Bank definition of OOP spending, which excludes indirect OOP spending. Conclusions: Excluding indirect OOP spending significantly underestimates the true incidence of CHS in Vietnam. Revising global definitions of OOP spending to include indirect OOP components may need to be considered to improve the accuracy of monitoring of financial protection. In the Vietnamese context, increasing the nurse-to-doctor ratio may help reduce indirect OOP spending and thereby the incidence of CHS. Further population-based research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.