ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2026
The therapeutic engagement index in autism: a hypothesis-generating framework for stratifying intervention responsiveness and adaptive therapeutic availability.
Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder is characterized by substantial heterogeneity in developmental trajectories, learning profiles, therapeutic participation, and response to intervention. Although intervention type, intensity, timing, fidelity, and baseline developmental profile are important predictors of outcome, they do not fully explain why autistic children exposed to broadly comparable interventions may show markedly different patterns of participation, learning, generalization, and adaptive change. TEI is defined as a multidimensional, context-sensitive, and observable construct describing the degree to which an autistic child can access, tolerate, respond to, sustain, and generalize therapeutic input within a specific intervention context. TEI is not intended to replace established constructs such as treatment engagement, therapeutic alliance, readiness, motivation, compliance, participation, developmental readiness, or treatment response. The manuscript clarifies the conceptual novelty of TEI, distinguishes it from related constructs, proposes candidate observable domains and indicators, outlines testable hypotheses, specifies boundary conditions, and provides a staged validation roadmap. TEI is not presented as a validated scale, clinical decision tool, diagnostic measure, compliance metric, or indicator of child responsibility for treatment outcome. Rather, it is proposed as a research framework for identifying modifiable conditions of therapeutic accessibility, including regulation, support fit, relational access, context, intervention demands, and developmental state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.