ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Feasibility Study of an Early, Interdisciplinary, Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Patients at Risk of Developing Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache: The PTHEENOT intervention.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Persistent post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a disabling consequence of mild head injury, leading to functional impairment, reduced quality of life, and adverse vocational outcomes. Evidence-based treatments are limited, and early, interdisciplinary, non-pharmacological interventions have been proposed to prevent symptom persistence. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of PTHEENOT (Post-traumatic Headache - Early Engagement in Non-pharmacological Treatment), combining nurse-led Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based psychoeducation with physiotherapy-guided activity and gradual return to daily life for patients at risk of persistent PTH. Patients and Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Adults with acute PTH following mild head injury were recruited between June and October 2024. Quantitative feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, and questionnaire usability rather than intervention effectiveness. Six participants (mean age 40.8 years) completed a five-week intervention at a specialized headache clinic, and self-reported questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were obtained through a focus group interview, analyzed using a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach inspired by Ricoeur. Results: Recruitment was feasible following adjustments, though early symptom improvement and work commitments limited retention. Adherence among completers was high, and questionnaires were manageable. Participants reported perceived improvements in headache management, functional engagement, sleep quality, and self-efficacy. Four themes emerged: 1. Balancing meaningful engagement and program intensity, 2. Gradual improvement and mastery, 3. Peer support is of great value in the recovery process, and 4. Experiences a lack of support and guidance during illness. Peer interactions were important for validation, motivation, and coping, while participants suggested extended session time and follow-up. Conclusion: The PTHEENOT intervention was acceptable, feasible, and perceived as meaningful by participants, supporting early, interdisciplinary approaches to PTH management. Findings provide guidance for refining intervention structure, delivery, and recruitment strategies prior to a randomized controlled trial aimed at preventing persistent PTH and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.