ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Bank-speed alignment: a conceptual framework for understanding indoor track performance.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indoor track performance is shaped by interactions among athlete characteristics, technology, and the structural environment of competition, yet the role of track geometry is not fully integrated into existing performance frameworks. While traditional approaches emphasize physiological and biomechanical factors internal to the athlete, features such as turn radius and bank angle may influence how running velocity is produced and maintained during curved running. The purpose of this conceptual analysis was to develop a framework for interpreting how track geometry interacts with running velocity to influence the mechanical demands of indoor track performance. Drawing on established biomechanical principles, including centripetal force and banked-surface dynamics, this work introduces the concept of bank-speed alignment, defined as the relationship between running velocity, turn radius, and bank angle under simplified mechanical conditions. This framework is presented as a conceptual synthesis of existing mechanical relationships rather than a new derivation or validated model of performance. The analysis illustrates that the bank angle associated with the mechanical reference condition is inherently velocity-dependent and therefore cannot be uniformly satisfied across sprint, middle-, and long-distance events. As a result, contemporary indoor track designs-typically constrained to bank angles of approximately 10°-12°-may differ in how closely they align with the velocity demands of different events, which may be associated with differences in mechanical demands during curved running. These relationships are intended to provide a basis for interpreting variability in performance conditions across facilities and events, while situating track geometry within a broader system that includes technological and contextual factors. Overall, this framework is intended as a hypothesis-generating perspective that reframes indoor track performance as an emergent outcome of interactions among athlete capacity, environmental structure, and competition context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.