Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318289›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the Entomological Society of America2026

Seeking the unseen: a review of host-finding strategies of parasitoids attacking wood-boring beetles.

Kelly L F Oten, Jian J Duan, Courtney L Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly L F OtenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-8929
Jian J DuanUSDA-ARS Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-3480
Courtney L JohnsonDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-152X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of biological control of insect pests by parasitoids ultimately depends on effective host foraging by the agents, which involves multiple processes and various cues associated with hosts' habitat, host-associated symbionts and other microbial organisms, and/or hosts themselves. In general, parasitoid interactions with concealed hosts such as wood-boring beetles differ significantly from those that attack exposed hosts (eg surface-feeding caterpillars, aphids) as they must rely on a more complex hierarchy of cues to first locate hosts' microhabitats and then hosts for their reproduction. These differences influence the parasitoid's host-finding strategies, specificity, and their efficacy in suppressing their host populations. Here, we review the major steps in host finding by parasitoids of wood-boring beetles and synthesize current knowledge on the chemical, vibrational, visual, and other cues that mediate each stage of the process. We highlight how these cues operate across different spatial scales, interact with parasitoid morphology and behavior, and shape the success of biological control programs targeting economically important wood-boring pests. Finally, we identify key knowledges gaps and point to some future research directions aimed at improving the selection, deployment, and monitoring of parasitoid biological control agents in forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

biological controlBuprestidaeCerambycidaeCurculionidaehost finding

Identifiers

PMID42318289
PMCPMC13273432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.