ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Machine Learning-Based Classification of Alertness Levels in Elite Shooting Athletes Using Heart Rate Variability.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a predictive model for alertness levels in elite shooting athletes by analyzing heart rate variability (HRV) dynamics under simulated competitive stress. 83 national-level shooting athletes completed a 60-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) protocol designed to mimic the sustained attentional demands of a competition, while HRV data were continuously recorded. Pearson correlation analysis identified HRV features associated with behavioral performance. Key predictors were selected via recursive feature elimination with Random Forest. Four machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and AdaBoost-were employed to construct classification models for alertness. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). SHAP analysis was applied to interpret feature contributions. The binary classification framework (optimal vs. sub-optimal alertness) demonstrated superior reliability over multi-class approaches. The AdaBoost model achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 0.75, an F1-score of 0.73, and an AUC of 0.77. SHAP analysis revealed that the very low frequency percentage (VLF%) was the most critical predictor, followed by the SD2/SD1 ratio. Notably, elevated VLF% values were associated with lower alertness levels. The binary classification model, integrating key HRV indices (notably VLF%) with the AdaBoost algorithm, can effectively distinguish alertness levels in shooting athletes during simulated competitive stress. This approach provides a validated, non-invasive tool for objective psychophysiological monitoring in training, offering actionable insights for pre-competition readiness assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.