ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2026
Hazard assessment of resin-based dental monomers: directions for greener dental material development.
Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing use of resin-based dental materials has prompted questions about their environmental footprint. During clinical procedures, small amounts of unpolymerized monomers may enter wastewater systems, and their possible effects on aquatic invertebrates remain insufficiently explored. We hypothesized that commonly used resin-based dental monomers could exert developmental and cellular effects in an aquatic invertebrate model. Materials and Methods: The acute and sublethal effects of five monomers associated with dental composites, namely - BPA (bisphenol A), Bis-DMA (bisphenol A dimethacrylate), Bis-GMA (bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate), Bis-EMA (bisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate), and TEG-DMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) - were evaluated in Results: Bis-GMA, Bis-DMA, and BPA significantly reduced survival, while Bis-EMA caused modest mortality, and TEG-DMA had no effect. Despite these differences in survival, most monomers affected naupliar growth, with greater developmental sensitivity observed following cyst-stage exposure. However, growth responses were compound specific and not uniformly dose-dependent across all monomers. LDH responses were monomer specific: Bis-GMA and Bis-DMA increased LDH activity, although Bis-DMA showed no consistent effect on growth, whereas BPA and TEG-DMA showed reductions in LDH activity, despite observed growth inhibition, and Bis-EMA showed no significant change. Conclusion: Taken together, our findings show that dental resin monomers differ in their developmental and metabolic impacts, highlighting the importance of considering safety alongside clinical performance when designing and selecting dental biomaterials. As the concentrations used were for hazard screening, these results indicate possible biological effects under controlled conditions but do not necessarily reflect environmental exposure scenarios or ecological risk. Additional studies at environmentally relevant exposure levels are needed to better evaluate ecological safety and support the development of more sustainable dental materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.