ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
A novel early screening approach for MCI due to AD based on a "maze" hand-interaction kinetic paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI due to AD) is a crucial stage for the early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and timely detection at this stage may provide opportunities for earlier intervention and potentially delay disease progression. Methods: This study proposed a digital early-screening method based on a touchscreen maze hand-interaction kinetic paradigm, which integrates digital biomarkers from the visuospatial/executive and episodic memory domains to support the screening of MCI due to AD. A customized maze task was administered to 40 patients with clinically diagnosed MCI due to AD and 40 healthy controls (HC). Behavioral data were collected, and two categories of digital biomarkers were extracted: (1) visuospatial/executive digital biomarkers, such as task completion time ( Results: The integrated digital biomarker model showed promising apparent discriminative performance in the full cohort, with an AUC of 0.899 (95% CI: 0.831-0.967). To reduce potential optimism associated with biomarker selection, model development, and model evaluation within the same dataset, internal validation was performed using full-pipeline repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation with all 16 candidate digital biomarkers entered into the validation procedure and biomarker selection repeated within each training fold. The internally validated model retained good discriminative performance, with a mean cross-validated AUC of 0.842, an empirical 95% interval of 0.779-0.878, an accuracy of 0.783, a sensitivity of 0.772, and a specificity of 0.795. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the proposed touchscreen maze-based digital assessment method may provide a promising and objective approach to supporting the early screening of MCI due to AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.