ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Unraveling the role of asymmetric excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to retinal ganglion cell direction selectivity.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the mechanisms underlying direction selectivity in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is crucial in visual neuroscience. Retinal direction selectivity is critical for gaze stabilization through optokinetic and vestibulo-ocular reflexes, and its loss impairs the ability to stabilize gaze and track moving objects, potentially impacting behaviors that rely on accurate motion detection. The prevailing hypothesis proposes that the interplay between excitatory and inhibitory inputs is pivotal for the emergence of direction selectivity in RGCs. Methods: To dissect the contributions of these inputs, we employed dynamic-clamp recordings utilizing computationally modeled, synthetic excitatory and inhibitory conductances of varying amplitudes and time onsets in mouse RGCs. Results: The use of combinations of excitatory and inhibitory conductances with altered amplitude or timing in configurations not found in natural physiological conditions, allowed us to evaluate the specific contribution and impact of these modified components on direction selectivity. We found that asymmetries in both excitatory and inhibitory inputs are critical for the emergence of sharp directional tuning. Discussion: Our findings contribute to advance our understanding of the cellular and synaptic mechanisms that underlie retinal direction selectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.