ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Assessment of disease activity control and evaluation strategy in patients with Takayasu arteritis undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For patients with Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) requiring cardiac surgery, optimizing preoperative disease activity control and assessment is pivotal to improving surgical outcomes; however, an established strategy to minimize activity-driven adverse events remains undefined. Following the 2014 implementation of an institutional, multidisciplinary TAK activity control and evaluation strategy, this study aimed to robustly assess its clinical safety. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 64 patients with TAK and cardiac involvement who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass surgery under this multidisciplinary protocol. Propensity score-matched non-TAK (NTAK) patients undergoing identical surgeries during the same period served as controls. Outcomes were short-term mortality/complications and mid-term survival/complications across a mean follow-up period of 4.1 years. Results: The TAK cohort demonstrated a higher incidence of surgical site complications than controls (17.19% vs. 0%, Discussion: Guided by a systematic, multidisciplinary disease activity control and evaluation strategy, cardiac surgery via cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with TAK was not associated with increased mortality or major perioperative complications compared to matched NTAK controls. Although patients with TAK face elevated long-term risks of recurrent cardiovascular events and future interventions, the risk of initial surgical failure was not augmented relative to matched NTAK controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.