ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2026
Gender dynamics in diagnostic imaging: Understanding patient preferences and enhancing radiologist preparedness for opposite-gender interactions.
Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explores gender dynamics in diagnostic imaging by identifying factors influencing patients' refusal of imaging by opposite-gender radiologists and examining radiologists' preparedness in managing such interactions. The goal is to propose targeted training strategies that enhance gender-sensitive, culturally competent radiology practices. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 120 radiology residents in public and private hospitals of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. A structured, paper-based questionnaire was used, comprising two sections: Section A assessed patient-related factors influencing refusal of imaging by opposite-gender radiologists; Section B explored radiologists' experiences, confidence, and preferences for gender-sensitive training. Results: Among patients, personal modesty (28.3%), religious beliefs (26.7%), and family influence (24.2%) were the primary reasons for refusing imaging by opposite-gender radiologists. Female patients most frequently cited modesty, while male patients emphasized religion and family. Radiologists reported varied comfort and preparedness in cross-gender interactions. Female radiologists showed significantly greater preparedness (p=.029) but encountered more perceived patient discomfort (p=.008). Preferred training areas included gender-sensitive communication (36.2%) and ethical/legal considerations (31.5%). Conclusion: Gender-related factors significantly influence patient decisions and radiologist preparedness in diagnostic imaging, especially in culturally conservative settings. Female radiologists appear more prepared but face distinct challenges. Incorporating structured training in gender-sensitive communication, cultural competence, and ethics can improve patient satisfaction and radiologist confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.