Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318086›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Retensionable All-Suture Anchor Extensor Mechanism Repair.

Zachary S Aman, Samuel G Lorentz, Robert T Tisherman, Jocelyn R Wittstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary S AmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-5323
Samuel G LorentzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Robert T TishermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-808X
Jocelyn R WittsteinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8096-3170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Extensor mechanism tendon ruptures, including the quadriceps and patellar tendons, are devastating injuries that most often require acute surgical repair to restore knee mechanics and function. There are 2 well-described categories of quadriceps repair techniques, including superior pole suture anchor repairs and transosseous repairs, with recent studies reporting similar overall outcomes. However, failure rates have been reported to be as high as 18% and 21%, respectively. Indications: Extensor mechanism ruptures. Technique Description: The described technique utilizes 2 transosseous patellar tunnels. Retensionable all-suture anchor loops are then passed from the distal cortex to the near cortex, setting the suture anchors at the distal cortex. A Krakow stitch is passed from proximal to distal along the medial tendon, through the suture loop, and then distal to proximal through the central tendon and tied. This is repeated for the lateral half of the tendon. The suture loops are then tensioned to reduce the quadriceps tendon to the patella. The knee is cycled to remove creep from the Krakow suture, and the anchors are retensioned as needed to avoid gapping. This technique can also be utilized for patellar tendon ruptures in a similar fashion, with passage of the loops from proximal to distal and setting of the all-suture implant at the superior pole. Results: In our experience, patients undergoing extensor mechanism repair with knotless retensionable all-suture anchors have achieved successful outcomes. The transosseous adjustable all-suture anchor has been shown to be biomechanically superior to a traditional transosseous suture repair, with significantly less gap formation, higher load-to-failure, and greater stiffness. Furthermore, the adjustable knotless anchor allows retensioning that may improve compression, minimize laxity both intra- and postoperatively, and allow more aggressive flexion range of motion during the early postoperative course. The all-suture anchor may also potentially limit complications related to hardware irritation when metal buttons are used for bicortical fixation or hard-bodied anchors are utilized at the superior pole. Discussion/Conclusion: Transosseous retensionable all-suture anchors offer an alternative high- strength construct for extensor mechanism repairs, with a unique ability to minimize creep within repair constructs intraoperatively. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

all-suture anchorextensor mechanism repairpatellar tendon rupturequadriceps rupture

Identifiers

PMID42318086
PMCPMC13272873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.