Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42318062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2026

Benchmarking the urinary transplant metabolome of kidney transplant recipients using healthy organ donors.

Naser B N Shehab, Kim C M Lammers-Jannink, Margriet H Riphagen, Siawosh K Eskandari, Jamil R Azzi, Martin H de Borst, Kerstin Bunte, Stephan J L Bakker, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naser B N Shehab *Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Kim C M Lammers-Jannink *Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Margriet H RiphagenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Siawosh K EskandariTransplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Jamil R AzziTransplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Martin H de BorstDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Kerstin BunteIntelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Groningen, Netherlands.
Stephan J L BakkerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
M Rebecca Heiner-FokkemaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation is the only curative treatment for end-stage kidney disease, providing markedly improved outcomes over dialysis. In search of optimized long-term outcomes, recent studies have demonstrated alterations in the metabolic state of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may contribute to chronic graft outcomes. Here, we sought to benchmark metabolic perturbations associated with the post-transplant state using a set of extensively characterized kidney transplant donors as healthy control. Methods: In this cross-sectional, single-center study, we used untargeted GC-MS to profile the 24 h urine from 121 stable KTRs (0.2-38.9 yrs post-transplant) and 94 extensively screened healthy potential kidney donors (HC) from the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study. We assessed group differences using linear models adjusted for baseline covariates including eGFR, and the multivariable OPLS-DA model for global separation. ROC analysis was performed on the top discriminants. GlobalTest Pathway enrichment was used to map differentially abundant metabolites in metabolic pathways from the KEGG database. Results: In KTRs, 28 metabolites were significantly altered compared to HC; 13 of which were elevated and 15 decreased in KTRs. Among them, methylmalonic acid (AUROC 0.886), citric acid (AUROC 0.870), and glycolic acid (AUROC 0.804) were all reduced in KTRs and showed the strongest in-sample separation between the groups. OPLS-DA achieved good group separation (R Conclusion: Urinary metabolic profiles in KTRs are consistent with alterations in TCA cycle, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, and branched chain amino acid degradation after transplantation. Although causality cannot be established from this cross-sectional design, these findings may reflect altered energy metabolism in the post-transplant state.

Indexed as

clinical researchhealthy donorskidney transplantationtransplant recipientsurinary metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID42318062
PMCPMC13272301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.