SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Machine learning-based prediction models for severe
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the predictive performance and methodological characteristics of machine learning-based models for predicting progression to severe Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to November 2025 to identify studies developing or validating prediction models for SMPP in children. Data on study characteristics, modeling algorithms, predictors, and performance metrics were extracted. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize model characteristics, predictors, and modeling approaches, while model discrimination was quantitatively synthesized using pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to modeling algorithms. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the PROBAST tool. Results: A total of 13 studies were included. The reported prevalence of hypoglycemia ranged from 17 to 33%. The AUC for predictive models ranged from 0.81 to 0.90. Subgroup analyses showed that machine learning-based models such as XGBoost and random forest generally reported higher AUC values compared with other modeling approaches. Commonly reported predictors included age, insulin use, body mass index, HbA1c, creatinine, and history of hypoglycemia. Conclusion: Research on risk prediction models for SMPP in children is still at a developmental stage. Although current models demonstrate high discriminatory performance, methodological limitations and limited clinical translation remain. Future studies should focus on developing robust, interpretable machine learning models and facilitating their integration into pediatric clinical practice. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ CRD42020190338.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.