Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317996›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Can public data openness enhance public health resource allocation efficiency? Evidence from the launch of Chinese government data platforms.

Zhenyu Li, Zhao Zhang, Yuning Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenyu LiSchool of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhao ZhangSchool of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuning ChuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Public health resource allocation efficiency constitutes a critical pillar for protecting public health and social welfare. Nevertheless, data silos and information asymmetry constrain the optimization of public health resource allocation. Methods: Taking the launch of Chinese government data platforms as a quasi-natural experiment, this study uses provincial panel data from 2009 to 2022, adopts DEA, staggered DID and other approaches to investigate the impact and transmission mechanisms of public data openness on public health resource allocation efficiency. Results: The findings indicate that, first, public data openness has a significantly positive effect on enhancing public health resource allocation efficiency. Second, the policy effect has obvious regional heterogeneity, with a stronger impact on underdeveloped regions. Third, exploratory channel analysis provides suggestive evidence that reducing information acquisition costs and strengthening external oversight may be the critical transmission pathways. Discussion: Based on these findings, efforts should focus on broadening the scope and deepening the application of data openness. This entails striking a balance between unlocking data value and protecting privacy to ensure coordinated progress. Simultaneously, differentiated regionally strategies should be adopted to promote fair distribution of policy dividends, ultimately enhancing the overall efficiency of public health resource allocation.

Indexed as

Public HealthResource AllocationChinaHumansdata governancepublic data opennesspublic health resource allocation efficiencyquasi-natural experimentstaggered DID

Identifiers

PMID42317996
PMCPMC13272126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.