ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Generative AI in physical education and health: a narrative review and conceptual framework for interdisciplinary thematic learning.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has created new possibilities for teaching and learning, yet its pedagogical role in physical education and health (PEH) remains underdeveloped. Current AI-related research in PEH has largely focused on performance-oriented and technical applications, such as motion analysis, skill evaluation, and training monitoring, with less attention to curriculum design, interdisciplinary learning, and teacher-mediated pedagogical use. This narrative review synthesizes literature on GenAI in PEH and related interdisciplinary or thematic learning contexts to examine how GenAI may support interdisciplinary thematic learning in PEH. The review highlights an emerging shift from AI as a technical or analytical tool toward GenAI as a pedagogical resource for lesson planning, assessment design, feedback, inquiry support, and knowledge integration. Based on this synthesis, the study proposes a pedagogical framework that positions GenAI as a teacher-mediated resource for connecting bodily practice, health knowledge, reflective inquiry, and social participation. The framework includes four core dimensions: curriculum and goal alignment, content organization and task design, inquiry and learning process support, and assessment and adaptive adjustment. It also emphasizes human-AI collaboration, teacher judgment, embodied observation, and ethical use as necessary conditions for meaningful implementation. The review suggests that GenAI may support PEH when it is integrated carefully into pedagogically designed, context-sensitive, and health-promoting learning processes. Future empirical research, particularly design-based studies and classroom interventions, is needed to test and refine the framework in authentic PEH settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.