Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Quantifying and mapping uncertainty in urban sentiment prediction: a combined approach with entropy and SHAP explanations.

Iuria Betco, Ana Isabel Ribeiro, Cláudia M Viana, Jorge Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iuria BetcoCentre of Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Isabel RibeiroCEGOT-Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Arts and Humanities of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Cláudia M VianaCentre of Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jorge RochaCentre of Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mental health issues have been increasing globally, possibly linked to urbaniza¬tion and related lifestyles. There's a growing awareness that different aspects of the urban environment can influence mental health, either enabling or restrict¬ing behaviors that affect well-being. Recent studies have increasingly used social media data and machine learning techniques to assess urban well-being. However, these approaches often lack interpretability and do not explicitly account for prediction uncertainty, limiting their reliability for spatial decision-making. Methods: This study uses sentiment labels derived from georeferenced posts on X (formerly Twitter) via the NRC Emotion Lexicon. Supervised machine learning models are trained to predict sentiment based on urban environmental variables and generate spatial predictions for Lisbon, with performance compared across K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Neural Network (NN). To go beyond simple point predictions, uncertainty at each location is measured with Shannon Entropy, based on class probabilities. Post-hoc explanations using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identify urban features most impacting sentiment predictions. Results and discussion: Uncertainty maps combined with SHAP outputs show where interpretations are more reliable (low uncertainty) and where caution is needed (high uncertainty). In Lisbon 2019, SHAP identified proximity to cycling networks, fitness facilities, and NDVI as key factors influencing sentiment. This framework enhances spatial understanding of sentiment-environment relationships and offers a transparent way to identify areas where predictions are more reliable.

Indexed as

EmotionsSocial MediaBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCitiesEntropyHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestUncertaintyagnostic modelsartificial intelligencesentiment analysisspatial uncertaintyurban environment

Identifiers

PMID42317993
PMCPMC13272443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.