ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Determinants of child restraint system selection and installation practices: implications for injury prevention and public health implementation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road traffic injuries remain a leading cause of death and serious harm among children, and a substantial proportion of this burden occurs among child passengers. Despite clear safety recommendations, incorrect installation and suboptimal child restraint system (CRS) selection remain widespread, representing a persistent public health implementation gap. Against this backdrop, the present study examined determinants of CRS selection decisions and self-reported installation and use practices, with a particular focus on how selection and retail-support experiences relate to intention to choose the same CRS again. A cross-sectional online survey (Google Forms) was conducted from February to December 2024, yielding 3,750 questionnaires, of which 1,150 complete cases were included in analysis. Descriptive statistics were supplemented with chi-square tests (Cramér's V) and multivariable logistic regression (odds ratios, 95% CI) for top-box intention to choose the same CRS again ("yes/probably yes"). Price (58.1%), seat weight (48.2%), and installation method (46.1%) were the most frequently reported selection determinants, while safety tests (28.3%) and comfort (26.4%) were less commonly cited. ISOFIX solutions predominated (74.6%), with installation most often behind the driver (45.0%) and a notable share on the front seat (25.4%). Intention to choose the same CRS again was low (27.4% top-box; 62.3% negative). Seller installation demonstration was associated with intention to choose the same CRS again (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.