ArticleCureus2026
Definitive Fixation Timing and Orthopedic Events After Polytrauma With Long Bone Fractures: A Secondary Cohort Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of definitive fixation in polytrauma patients with long bone fractures must balance the benefits of early skeletal stabilization against the risks of operative stress in physiologically unstable patients. This study evaluated whether definitive fixation performed more than 24 hours after injury was associated with early orthopedic procedural events and broader adverse orthopedic outcomes.
methodsWe performed a secondary retrospective cohort analysis of 115 adult polytrauma patients with operatively treated long bone fractures. Early definitive fixation was defined as fixation within 24 hours (≤24 hours) after injury, and delayed fixation was defined as fixation more than 24 hours after injury. The primary endpoint was an early orthopedic procedural event, defined as deep surgical site infection within 90 days, reoperation by six months, or bone graft/biologic augmentation by six months. Secondary endpoints included a broader adverse orthopedic course, delayed union at 24 weeks, clinical union at 24 weeks, and nonunion at nine months. Continuous variables were compared using Welch's t-test. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-square test when expected cell counts were adequate and Fisher's exact test when expected cell counts were low. Logistic regression was used for exploratory adjusted analyses.
resultsDefinitive fixation was performed within 24 hours in 33 patients (28.7%) and after 24 hours in 82 patients (71.3%). The primary procedural endpoint occurred in 20/115 patients (17.4%) and did not differ significantly between groups (4/33 patients (12.1%) vs. 16/82 patients (19.5%); chi-square = 0.895; p = 0.344). The broader adverse orthopedic course was more frequent after fixation beyond 24 hours (40/82 patients (48.8%) vs. 7/33 patients (21.2%); chi-square value = 7.400; p = 0.007). Delayed union at 24 weeks was also more frequent in the delayed fixation group (34/82 patients (41.5%) vs. 5/33 patients (15.2%); chi-square value = 7.269; p = 0.007). In adjusted analysis, fixation after 24 hours remained associated with the broader adverse orthopedic course (adjusted odds ratio = 3.00; 95% confidence interval = 1.09-8.25; z value = 2.124; p = 0.034), but not with the primary procedural endpoint.
conclusionsIn this secondary cohort analysis, definitive fixation beyond 24 hours was not independently associated with early orthopedic procedural events, but it was associated with a broader adverse orthopedic course driven mainly by delayed union. These findings support a cautious interpretation of fixation timing as both a potentially modifiable treatment factor and a marker of underlying physiologic and injury-pattern complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.