ArticleCureus2026
Factors Affecting Patients' Selection of an Ophthalmologist in Saudi Arabia: A Patient-Centered Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients' preferences play a major role in selecting health care providers, yet, to our knowledge, no prior research in Saudi Arabia has examined which factors most influence the choice of an ophthalmologist. This study aimed to identify the key determinants guiding patients' decisions and explore demographic differences.
methodsAn analytical cross-sectional survey was conducted from September 2025 to February 2026, among adults who had visited an ophthalmology clinic in the past 12 months. A total of 418 participants completed an online questionnaire assessing sociodemographic data, clinical background, Likert-scale ratings of 28 selection factors, and the top three most influential factors. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used, with significance set at p<0.05.
resultsCommunication quality and clinical competence were the strongest influences. The most important factors were taking enough time to answer questions (90.7%), availability of modern equipment (88.3%), clinic cleanliness (88.0%), and clear explanation of test results (87.1%). Clinical expertise indicators, including years of experience (84.0%), subspecialty fellowship (78.7%), and low complication rates (76.1%), were also highly valued. The top three selected factors were years of experience (56.2%), subspecialty fellowship (53.6%), and board certification (40.4%). Social media presence and cost-related factors had a limited influence.
conclusionPatients in Saudi Arabia prioritize professional expertise, effective communication, and a clean, well-equipped clinical environment when choosing an ophthalmologist. Convenience, cost, and social media play a secondary role. Strengthening clinical credibility and patient-centered communication may enhance patient trust and decision-making in ophthalmic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.