ArticleCureus2026
Correlation Between Screen Time, Sleep Duration, and Stroop Effect Among First-Year Osteopathic Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Stroop test is a well‑validated measure of selective attention and inhibitory control. Although increased electronic device use has been consistently associated with shorter sleep duration and delayed bedtime, whether everyday variability in screen time and sleep relates to Stroop performance in medical trainees remains uncertain, and existing findings on executive function are mixed.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine associations between average daily screen time, self‑reported sleep duration (past week and past month), and Stroop performance measured using the EncephalApp (congruent reaction time, incongruent reaction time, and Stroop interference) in first-year osteopathic medical students.
methodsIn this cross‑sectional study conducted between March and July 2025, 69 first‑year osteopathic medical students were recruited, of whom 49 (10 male, 39 female) provided complete datasets. Participants completed the EncephalApp Stroop test on their smartphone and an anonymous survey reporting demographic characteristics, average daily screen time over the past week, and sleep duration over the past week and past month. Simple linear regression analyses were used to examine associations between Stroop interference and screen time, Stroop interference and sleep duration, and between screen time and sleep duration.
resultsParticipants (n = 49; 10 male, 39 female) had a mean age of 25.61 ± 3.58 years. The mean congruent reaction time (OffTime) was 54.06 ± 10.06 seconds, the incongruent reaction time (OnTime) was 60.94 ± 13.59 seconds, and the mean Stroop interference score was 6.87 ± 7.38 seconds. The average daily screen time over the past week was 6.10 ± 3.12 hours, while the average sleep duration was 6.93 ± 1.26 hours over the past week and 7.04 ± 1.16 hours over the past month. Stroop interference was not significantly associated with screen time (R² = 0.0023; p = 0.746) or sleep duration (past week: R² = 0.0287; p = 0.250; past month: R² = 0.0303; p = 0.237). However, screen time was inversely associated with sleep duration over the past week (R² = 0.14; β = -0.152 hours of sleep per additional hour of screen time; p = 0.0088).
conclusionsAmong first-year osteopathic medical students, typical variation in screen time and sleep duration was not associated with Stroop‑indexed selective attention. Higher screen time was, however, moderately associated with shorter sleep duration. These findings are consistent with prior evidence linking electronic media use to reduced sleep and suggest that modest between‑person differences in sleep and screen exposure may not translate into measurable differences in Stroop performance in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.