Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317893›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Lifting the Standards: A Systematic Review of Aesthetic Scarless Breast Surgery.

Emily R Stack, Jared Garfinkle, Erin N Burns, Colby V Spongberg, David Steckler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily R StackSurgery, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Jared GarfinkleSurgery, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.
Erin N BurnsSurgery, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Colby V SpongbergSurgery, Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Great Falls, USA.
David StecklerPlastic Surgery, Mississippi Center for Plastic Surgery, Ridgeland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scarless breast surgery techniques, such as radiofrequency-assisted mastopexy, transaxillary and transumbilical augmentation, and liposuction-based reductions, have gained popularity for delivering aesthetic results while minimizing visible scarring. However, evidence on outcomes and complication rates across techniques remains variable. A systematic review of 11 studies with 1,517 patients undergoing scarless aesthetic breast procedures was conducted. Data on surgical techniques, patient satisfaction, anatomical changes, and complications were extracted. Outcomes were assessed through photographic reviews, global aesthetic scales, and objective measurements of nipple and areolar position. The average patient age was 34 years. Radiofrequency-assisted mastopexy reported a mean nipple lift of 1.2 cm, while the "Compass Rose" suture technique achieved an average areolar width reduction of 11 mm. Transaxillary and transumbilical augmentations demonstrated patient satisfaction rates of ≥90%. Reported complications were generally low and included hematoma (n=2), capsular contracture (n=2), implant malposition (n=1), and minor wound-related issues. Overall, complication rates were similar to or lower than those associated with traditional augmentation and mastopexy techniques. Scarless aesthetic breast procedures provide high patient satisfaction and measurable improvements in breast contour and nipple position, with complication rates comparable to conventional approaches. Future research should focus on standardized reporting and long-term outcomes to better define the efficacy and safety of these minimally invasive techniques.

Indexed as

breast aesthetic surgerybreast surgerymastopexy techniquesminimally invasive surgeryscarless surgery

Identifiers

PMID42317893
PMCPMC13274956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.