ArticleCureus2026
Readability of Arabic Web-Based Information on Nitrous Oxide Sedation for Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNitrous oxide inhalation sedation is a cornerstone of behavior management in pediatric dentistry, widely used to reduce anxiety and enhance cooperation in child dental patients. Online health information significantly influences parental understanding and decision-making regarding their children's dental treatment. However, the readability of Arabic web-based information on this topic remains unexplored.
objectiveTo assess the readability of Arabic web-based information on nitrous oxide sedation in pediatric dentistry using the Gunning Fog Index (GFI), with implications for parental understanding.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2026. The first 100 search results were screened from Google, Yahoo, and Bing using four Arabic search phrases. Eligible Arabic-language websites were analyzed using the online Gunning Fog Index calculator. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and readability was stratified by search engine and content source. The exact Arabic search terms used were "أكسيد النيتروز للأطفال" (nitrous oxide for children), "أكسيد النيتروز" (nitrous oxide), "الغاز الضاحك" (laughing gas), and "التخدير باستنشاق أكسيد النيتروز" (nitrous oxide inhalation sedation). The searches were conducted in May 2026 using standard browser settings (Google Chrome in incognito mode; Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA)) to minimize personalization effects.
resultsThirty-two websites met the inclusion criteria. The mean GFI was 9.92 ± 4.42 (range: 2.00-19.00), corresponding to a high school sophomore reading level. Only 12.5% (4/32) of websites met the American Medical Association's (AMA) recommended reading level (GFI ≤6). Most content originated from private dental practices (65.6%, 21/32). Public journals demonstrated significantly higher GFI scores (mean: 16.00 ± 3.46) compared to private practices (9.32 ± 3.96).
conclusionArabic web-based information on nitrous oxide sedation for pediatric dental patients exceeds recommended readability levels for parental education materials. Pediatric dentists and content creators should simplify online health information to improve parental comprehension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.