ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
Optimizing an LLM-Based Clinical Data Querying System Using Metadata Enrichment and Task Decomposition.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessing complex clinical registries traditionally requires SQL programming expertise, limiting data accessibility for non-technical researchers. In this paper, we designed and evaluated whether a text-to-SQL solution based on large language models (LLMs) could enable natural language querying of a real-world clinical registry under strict privacy and security constraints. Using self-hosted, open-source LLMs, we developed a multi-layered optimization framework incorporating metadata enrichment, query decomposition, hybrid retrieval, and SQL self-correction. We assessed its performance across 600 queries spanning one-, two-, and three-field complexity using execution-based validation. Accuracy was improved from 88.0% to 94.5% for one-field queries and from 10.0% to 82.0% for three-field queries. Real-world testing by data scientists revealed domain-specific challenges related to coded variables, clinical ambiguity, and multi-step reasoning. We summarize key technical and operational lessons learned and discuss implications for safe, scalable deployment of LLM-assisted analytic tools in clinical registry environments.
Identifiers
42317855PMC13274305What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.