ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
Temporal Recurrent Neural Networks for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Recovery by Time of Discharge.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common complication in hospitalized patients and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, readmission, and chronic kidney disease. Early identification of patients at risk of AKI non-recovery can improve discharge planning and follow-up. Using a retrospective cohort of 7,667 patient encounters diagnosed with AKI from the University of California San Diego Health, we compared traditional machine learning (ML) and temporal deep learning (DL) models to predict three AKI recovery outcomes: Recovery, Partial Recovery, and Non-Recovery. The ML models evaluated were Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost; while, the DL models were Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long-Short Term Memory. On the test set, DL models consistently outperformed traditional ML approaches. The GRU model achieved the highest Macro-Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.822) with strong discrimination for the Non-Recovery class (AUC 0.932). This work demonstrates that temporal modeling of clinical trajectories can enhance AKI recovery prediction.
Identifiers
42317853PMC13274321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.