ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
Pre-Post Evaluation of Documentation Burden, Time Perception, and Cognitive Workload of Ambient AI Scribe Tools.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Documentation burden and cognitive load contribute to clinician burnout, and ambient AI scribes offer a promising solution, though real-world evaluations remain limited. This study evaluated the impact of an ambient AI scribe on documentation burden, cognitive workload, and perceived burnout in clinical practice. Forty clinicians participated in a 60-day pilot during which the AI scribe generated draft notes from encounter audio. Pre- and post-implementation surveys included validated single-item burnout measure, workflow assessments, NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) scores, and EHR-autologged data on after-hours documentation. Clinicians reported significant reductions in perceived documentation time and after-hours work (all p < 0.001), with large effect sizes (r = 0.73-0.80). NASA-TLX domains demonstrated significant decreases in mental demand, physical demand, effort, time pressure, and stress (all p ≤0.001; g = 0.76-1.54). In contrast, objective EHR documentation minutes did not change significantly (t (15) = 1.52, p = 0.15, g = 0.36). Perceived documentation time aligned more closely with objective EHR-derived categories following implementation. These findings suggest that ambient AI scribes meaningfully reduce perceived workload and improve calibration of documentation burden, even when measurable documentation time remains stable.
Identifiers
42317843PMC13274272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.