ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
ChartOCR: A Longitudinal OCR System Using a Unified Periodontal Assessment Form.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periodontitis generates substantial clinical data, yet periodontal and PI charts remain predominantly paper-based, which limits reuse for clinical analysis and decision support. We present ChartOCR, a system that digitizes unified periodontal-plaque forms using template-based alignment, coordinate-based region-of-interest extraction, a fine-tuned TrOCR model, and SHA-256. ChartOCR supports common handwriting conventions and provides an interactive interface with real-time result streaming, in-place correction, and CSV export. We evaluated the system on 30 scanned handwritten charts. Periodontal charts achieved a mean accuracy and mAP of 0.987, while PI charts reached 0.942 accuracy and 0.884 mAP. Most digits performed well, although PPV was lower for higher plaque scores. On a MacBook Pro (M3 Pro), the average processing time per chart was approximately 70 seconds. These results demonstrate that our approach enables accurate, efficient digitization of handwritten dental charts and provides a scalable foundation for periodontal informatics research.
Identifiers
42317837PMC13274332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.