ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
Title: Multimodal Fusion of Clinical and Imaging Data for Early Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Massive transfusion (MT) prediction in trauma remains limited by scoring systems with suboptimal discrimination and generalizability. We developed a multimodal joint fusion model integrating structured electronic health record (EHR) data with admission chest X-rays to support early MT risk stratification. From 33,824 trauma patients (2014-2024), 10,090 met inclusion criteria, including 226 MT cases (2.24%). Structured presentation variables were modeled using a multilayer perceptron, while imaging features were extracted using a pretrained DenseNet-121; intermediate feature fusion enabled end-to-end learning. Class imbalance was addressed with SMOTE for structured data and geometric augmentation for imaging. On the held-out validation set, the fusion model achieved an AUC of 0.669. At the selected threshold, sensitivity was 0.72 and specificity 0.84. Grad-CAM visualizations demonstrated attention over clinically relevant thoracoabdominal regions. Despite limited positive predictive value due to low event prevalence, these findings demonstrate feasibility of workflow-aligned multimodal MT prediction using routinely available data, warranting prospective multi-center validation.
Identifiers
42317825PMC13274277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.