ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2026
Evaluating Linkage Approaches for Address-Level Socioenvironmental Exposure Assessment.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision risk assessment for pediatric hospitalization using address-level data in Cincinnati, Ohio.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate linkage of addresses to parcel-level data is essential for hyperlocal environmental exposure assessment, yet the performance of methods, including their impact on exposure misclassification and bias, remains poorly characterized. Using a gold standard match of 853,255 National Address Database records to authoritative datasets from Hamilton and Franklin Counties, Ohio, we evaluated address tag fuzzy matching and geocoding-based (geomatching) approaches on accuracy of linked parcel identifier and parcel market total value and usage type. Address tag fuzzy matching achieved 100% agreement; address point geomatching performed moderately well (65.1% - 76.1%), and street range geomatching performed poorly (7.2% - 59.2%). Poorer agreement was more common in neighborhoods with higher address densities and more community material deprivation, highlighting potential for differential misclassification of exposure assessment. These findings emphasize a need for precise, scalable, and standardized linkage approaches to support valid address- and parcel-level exposure assessment in clinical and population health research.
Identifiers
42317809PMC13274357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.