Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317776›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Comparing the Use of Measured and Smoothed Data in Forecasting Visual Field Tests Using Deep Learning.

Ashkan Abbasi, Sowjanya Gowrisankaran, Wei-Chun Lin, Xubo Song, Bhavna Josephine Antony, Gadi Wollstein, Joel S Schuman, Hiroshi Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashkan AbbasiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sowjanya GowrisankaranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Wei-Chun LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Xubo SongDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Bhavna Josephine AntonyInformation Technology, Institute of Innovation, Science & Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Gadi WollsteinGlaucoma Service and Vickie and Jack Farber Vision Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joel S SchumanGlaucoma Service and Vickie and Jack Farber Vision Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hiroshi IshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Longitudinal Ocular Changes in Naturally Occurring Glaucoma Animal ModelR01EY035174 · NEI · WILLS EYE HEALTH SYSTEM · PI Gadi Wollstein · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Biomarkers of Early Experimental Glaucoma - Resubmission - 1R01EY030770 · NEI · WILLS EYE HEALTH SYSTEM · PI WOLLSTEIN, GADI · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030770NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of training and testing deep learning (DL) models for visual field (VF) forecasting using input-target pairs in which the target is either the measured VF test result, or its smoothed counterpart constructed via linear regression. Design: A retrospective data analysis study evaluating DL models for VF forecasting under multiple training and testing configurations. Subjects and Controls: A total of 1400 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19 437 reliable Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests collected from longitudinal cohorts at the University of Pittsburgh and New York University. Methods: Three DL-based pointwise VF forecasting methods were trained and tested under 4 different configurations formed by using measured and smoothed VF targets. Smoothed targets were constructed by applying linear regression over triplets of consecutive VF tests. Models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation and mean absolute error (MAE) as the training and testing metric. Main Outcome Measures: Mean absolute error of forecasted VF test results under various training and testing configurations. Results: Models trained and tested on smoothed VF targets consistently achieved lower MAEs compared to those trained and tested on measured VF targets. The performance improvements were most prominent in the 0.5- to 1.5-year forecast range. Furthermore, models trained with smoothed VF targets showed comparable performance when evaluated against measured VF targets. Conclusions: Using smoothed VF targets for training improves forecasting accuracy by guiding DL models to learn long-term trends in the data rather than forcing them to model noise and short-term variabilities, which are prevalent in VF test data. This approach aligns with clinical goals of assessing meaningful functional changes over time and suggested to be considered in future DL-based VF modeling efforts. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Deep learningGlaucomaLong-term visual field test forecastingVisual field testing

Identifiers

PMID42317776
PMCPMC13273650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.