Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317773›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2026

Transformation of public administration in the sphere of forensic science activity in Ukraine under martial law.

Nataliia Martynenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nataliia MartynenkoDepartment of Law and Public Administration, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31, Povitroflotsky Avenue, Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current shortcomings in the public administration of forensic science activities in Ukraine have been analyzed. The work of state specialized institutions in wartime conditions has been examined. The technical and political significance of the digitalization of forensic science activities is clarified. Attention is paid to the problems of instability in the management and staffing of forensic institutions. The issue of standardization and accreditation of forensic institutions is examined. The importance of expanding international cooperation is emphasized. The proposed reform initiatives cover both the organizational and managerial aspects as well as the technological aspects of the development of the forensic science system, forming a comprehensive model for its adaptation to contemporary security, social, and technological challenges. Ensuring impartial development of norms and their equal application to all participants in the expert services market is possible only if there is a clear delineation of the functionality: formation of public policy, regulation and control, as well as management of forensic institutions. Such a division of powers minimizes the risks of unequal conditions for different subjects. Effective mechanisms for public administration of the field of forensic science expertise in conditions of martial law should be contextually relevant and capable of implementing changes without resistance.

Indexed as

AccreditationDigitalizationForensic scienceMartial lawPublic administrationResilient governanceStandardization

Identifiers

PMID42317773
PMCPMC13272516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.