ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Family coalitions and restrictive eating disorders in adolescence: a lausanne trilogue play study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coparenting, defined as the ability of mothers and fathers to coordinate and provide mutual support in parenting, plays a key role in children's social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment. While previous research has highlighted its influence on internalizing and externalizing problems, comparatively less is known about how children contribute to and respond to coparenting at a relational level. Objective: This study investigates coparenting behaviors in families of adolescents with restrictive eating disorders and examines their association with the patients' interactive styles during the Lausanne Trilogue Play. We also explore potential correlations of coalition patterns with age, BMI, and clinical diagnosis. Methods: Seventy-seven adolescents with restrictive Eating Disorders (DSM-5) and their parents participated. Most families (81%) were intact. Coparenting coordination was assessed using the Coparenting and Family Rating System, while children's interactive styles were coded using the Lausanne Trilogue Play reading grid adapted for preadolescents and adolescents. Results: Distinct coalition patterns emerged linking coparenting behaviors and adolescent interactive styles. Functional coparenting was associated with engaged child responses, whereas dysfunctional patterns corresponded to overinvolved responses. No significant correlations were found between coalition patterns and Body Mass Index, age, or specific Eating Disorders diagnosis, suggesting that these relational dynamics do not reflect current clinical status and needed more investigations. Conclusion: Identifying coalition patterns between coparenting and adolescent interactive styles provides valuable insights for family-based interventions in restrictive Eating Disorders. Such patterns allow clinicians to recognize both challenges and resources within the family system, informing psychoeducational and therapeutic strategies that integrate parental support with clinical and nutritional care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.