ReviewChemical science2026
Interrogating the synthetic likelihood of metal-organic frameworks: a digital discovery perspective.
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel "turn-on" fluorescence probe for chromium(III) sensing: experimental validation and theoretical insights.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital discovery of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has advanced rapidly, driven by the tremendously large number of experimentally synthesized and computationally designed structures, high-throughput screening, and artificial intelligence. Yet a fundamental bottleneck remains: many hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) may never reach a chemical laboratory. This gap has rendered the synthetic likelihood of MOFs a central challenge in translating digital MOF discovery into experimental synthesis and test. In this perspective, we provide an overview of recent progress in interrogating the synthetic likelihood of MOFs. First, thermodynamic analysis, focusing on free energy as a physically grounded metric for assessing synthesizability, is presented. Then, emerging data-driven heuristics, such as synthetic scores, classification models for synthesizability prediction, and machine-learning methods for predicting synthesis conditions directly from atomic structures, are discussed. Finally, we offer an outlook on future directions, including scalable free-energy calculations, synthesis-aware inverse design, and unified databases that incorporate both successful and failed synthesis attempts. It is highly anticipated that integrating these advances will transform MOF discovery from performance-driven screening into synthesis-informed design, thereby accelerating the realization of computationally designed structures in experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.