Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317671›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Interrogating the synthetic likelihood of metal-organic frameworks: a digital discovery perspective.

Xiaoyu Wu, Jianwen Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoyu WuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore 117576 Singapore chejj@nus.edu.sg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5625-1180
Jianwen JiangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore 117576 Singapore chejj@nus.edu.sg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-9024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital discovery of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has advanced rapidly, driven by the tremendously large number of experimentally synthesized and computationally designed structures, high-throughput screening, and artificial intelligence. Yet a fundamental bottleneck remains: many hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) may never reach a chemical laboratory. This gap has rendered the synthetic likelihood of MOFs a central challenge in translating digital MOF discovery into experimental synthesis and test. In this perspective, we provide an overview of recent progress in interrogating the synthetic likelihood of MOFs. First, thermodynamic analysis, focusing on free energy as a physically grounded metric for assessing synthesizability, is presented. Then, emerging data-driven heuristics, such as synthetic scores, classification models for synthesizability prediction, and machine-learning methods for predicting synthesis conditions directly from atomic structures, are discussed. Finally, we offer an outlook on future directions, including scalable free-energy calculations, synthesis-aware inverse design, and unified databases that incorporate both successful and failed synthesis attempts. It is highly anticipated that integrating these advances will transform MOF discovery from performance-driven screening into synthesis-informed design, thereby accelerating the realization of computationally designed structures in experiments.

Identifiers

PMID42317671
PMCPMC13273369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.