Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Feeding challenges in larger versus smaller preterm discordant twins.

Shuyang Xu, Jing Yue, Yimin Dai, Jie Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuyang Xu *Department of Neonatology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jing Yue *Department of Neonatology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yimin DaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jie QiuDepartment of Neonatology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to compare the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and feed intolerance between the larger and the smaller preterm twin in dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC) twins with birth weight discordance (BWD). Methods: All consecutive live-born twin pairs born in the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 1 January 2023, and 31 July 2025, were reviewed. BWD was defined as more than 20% difference in intertwin birth weight. Neonatal outcomes were compared between the larger and the smaller twin within each twin pair. Data on the start time of enteral feeding, time to attain full enteral feeds (FEF), delayed attainment of FEF, number of fasting episodes, maximum physiological weight loss, time to regain birth weight, the average weight growth velocity, and the frequency of breastfeeding were collected. Results: We included 30 DC twins and 35 MC twins. The smaller twin had a higher frequency of NEC than the larger twin in both the DC group (23.33% vs Conclusions: In preterm twins with BWD, the smaller twin has an increased risk of NEC compared with the larger one, which may be attributed to the small twin being SGA. Therefore, the smaller twin needs close observation and monitoring in the early phase after birth because these preterm infants are at increased risk for feeding intolerance.

Indexed as

birth weight discordancefull enteral feedsnecrotizing enterocolitispreterm infantsmall for gestational agetwins

Identifiers

PMID42317649
PMCPMC13272374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.