ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Effect of semen collection timing on physiological responses and sperm functional parameters in Thai native bulls under tropical heat stress.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of semen collection timing (06:00-08:00 h [morning] vs. 12:00-14:00 h [afternoon]) on semen quality in Thai native bulls under tropical heat stress conditions. Physiological responses, endocrine profiles, and sperm lipid peroxidation were also evaluated. Nine bulls were subjected to a multiple crossover design, with semen collection alternated between morning and afternoon periods across 12 sessions per animal. Environmental parameters, including temperature-humidity index (THI), were continuously monitored. Afternoon collections occurred under higher ambient temperature and THI (>81) than morning collections (77-80), accompanied by increased heart rate (93.88 vs. 79.75 beats/min; P < 0.001) and elevated average scrotal surface temperature (35.08 vs. 33.90 °C; P < 0.001). Serum cortisol concentrations did not differ between collection periods (2.36 vs. 2.18 ng/mL; P > 0.05), whereas testosterone levels were significantly higher in the afternoon (2.23 vs. 1.99 ng/mL; P < 0.05). Afternoon-collected semen exhibited higher total motility (82.80% vs. 76.02%; P < 0.05) and viability (83.68% vs. 77.24%; P < 0.05). However, acrosome integrity was significantly lower in afternoon collections than in morning collections (83.90% vs. 87.40%; P < 0.05), accompanied by higher malondialdehyde concentrations (1.15 vs. 0.84 µM/mL; P < 0.05). Midpiece abnormalities and bent tails with retained droplets were more prevalent in afternoon samples. These findings suggest a physiological trade-off between enhanced sperm motility and increased structural damage to sperm during afternoon semen collection under tropical heat stress. Morning collection may better preserve acrosome integrity and sperm morphology despite lower motility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.