Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317638›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

Secure healthcare data management using federated learning, blockchain, and explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic review.

Tanisha Bhardwaj, K Sumangali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanisha BhardwajSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
K SumangaliSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid digitization of healthcare systems, there has been a huge collection of sensitive personal data of patients. Thus, secure, privacy-preserving, and efficient data management systems are required. Current distributed healthcare systems increasingly use centralized data processing frameworks that are prone to privacy violations, data fragmentation, and malicious attacks. Despite advances in federated learning, blockchain, explainable AI, and incremental optimization, current survey literature studies each technology separately without considering how the four technologies can be harnessed to create synergies. A systematic review of 26 peer-reviewed studies published from 2018 to 2026 indicates that an integrated architecture incorporating federated learning, blockchain, explainable AI, and incremental optimization can be designed. This review identifies ten critical issues that need to be addressed when researching the four technologies. These issues include communication costs, scalability issues, interoperability concerns, limited clinical explainability, and high computational costs when applied in real-time situations. In comparison to privacy, scalability, interpretability, and efficiency, a hybrid approach can help improve data security, boost the interpretability of the models, facilitate data sharing, and prevent data-sharing risks. Overall quality assessment based on the CASP qualitative checklist analysis of all 26 studies indicated an average score of 7.0 out of 10, implying that the quality of the methods used in the studies was acceptable.

Indexed as

blockchain technologydifferential privacyexplainable artificial intelligencefederated learningGDPR compliancehealthcare data securityincremental learninginternet of medical things (IoMT)

Identifiers

PMID42317638
PMCPMC13272014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.