ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Digital resources and interactive multimedia tools for breastfeeding promotion and support: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Public health innovations for enhancing newborn and maternal wellbeing.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding is widely recognized as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions for improving maternal and child health outcomes. Nevertheless, breastfeeding indicators remain suboptimal worldwide despite strong international recommendations. In recent years, digital technologies have emerged as tools to support breastfeeding promotion, education, and continuity. However, the evidence on digital and multimedia breastfeeding interventions is heterogeneous and scattered across disciplines, limiting a comprehensive understanding of their scope and effectiveness. For the purposes of this review, "digital resources" refers broadly to digital platforms and technologies used to deliver breastfeeding-related information or support; "interactive multimedia tools" refers to resources integrating two or more media formats (e.g., text, audio, video, graphics) with user interaction; and "digital interventions" is used as an umbrella term encompassing both concepts. Objective: To systematically map and synthesize available evidence on digital resources and interactive multimedia tools used to promote and support breastfeeding, describing their characteristics, implementation contexts, target populations, reported outcomes, and limitations. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The methodological approach was also aligned with selected recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. Searches were carried out in PubMed, the Virtual Health Library (VHL), Google Scholar, and the AI-powered tool Consensus between April 2023 and July 2024. Peer-reviewed publications in English and Spanish from the last 10 years addressing digital resources or interactive multimedia tools for breastfeeding promotion or support were included. Data were extracted and synthesized using a descriptive analytical approach. Results: A total of 23 studies published between 2019 and 2024 were included. The review identified a range of digital interventions, including social media platforms, mobile health (mHealth) applications, web-based resources, educational videos, telemedicine services, and multimedia materials. Most studies targeted pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers, often in contexts of social or economic vulnerability. Overall, digital interventions were associated with increased breastfeeding knowledge, improved maternal self-efficacy, enhanced access to information and peer support, and favorable perceptions. However, evidence regarding breastfeeding duration and exclusivity was inconsistent, and substantial variability was observed in intervention design, implementation strategies, and outcome measurement. Studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were identified, with social media campaigns and low-cost mobile approaches appearing particularly relevant in resource-constrained contexts. Conclusion: Digital resources and interactive multimedia tools represent promising complementary strategies for breastfeeding promotion and support. This scoping review highlights both the potential benefits and the heterogeneity of existing digital interventions, emphasizing the need for standardized, theory-informed, and context-sensitive approaches to strengthen evidence-based practice and future research in digital breastfeeding support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.