ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Exploring the Interface Between International Nongovernmental Organizations and Local Vietnamese Hospitals in Cleft Care.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite recent advances in cleft care, Vietnam continues to have extensive involvement from international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), creating a fragmented system with limited coordination. This project seeks to establish a baseline understanding of Vietnam's cleft care landscape, including major international NGOs and their collaborations with local partners, costs and insurance coverage, and patterns applicable to other low- and middle-income countries with NGO-supported cleft care. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using literature review and semi-structured interviews with surgeons, hospital administrators, and NGO representatives (n = 7). Sources included PubMed, targeted Google searches, and government regulations on NGO involvement, cleft care costs, and insurance policies. Results: Vietnam partners with 17 international NGOs that operate through 3 distinct but complementary models: vertical, horizontal, and diagonal models. These collaborations offer financial support, infrastructure, technology investment, and research development, leading to higher surgical volume, more timely access to care, and implementation of standardized multidisciplinary cleft services in Vietnam. National insurance provides broad coverage but requires a complex referral process with limited benefits for secondary cleft services. Limited awareness of insurance benefits and mistrust of local care further discourage the use of national health insurance. Conclusions: Improving access to comprehensive cleft services in Vietnam requires streamlining insurance referral pathways and decentralizing advanced cleft services to regional centers to ensure continuity of care. Aligning NGO activities with national policies is essential to building a coordinated and sustainable cleft care system in Vietnam and in other low- and middle-income countries with strong insurance frameworks and significant NGO involvement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.