Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317529›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026

Modifications of Biodentine and Their Influence on Endodontic Properties: A Scoping Review.

Rumesa Batul, Abdul Habeeb Adil, Niher Tabassum Snigdha, Ankita Mathur, Sushma Bommanavar, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rumesa BatulConservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kota Bharu, 16150, Malaysia, usm.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4448-2798
Abdul Habeeb AdilCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140417, Punjab, India, chitkara.edu.in.
Niher Tabassum SnigdhaDepartment of Dental Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India, saveetha.com.
Ankita MathurDepartment of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India, dpu.edu.in.
Sushma BommanavarCentre for Research and Innovation, Academy of Maritime Education and Training (AMET) Deemed to be University, Kanathur, Chennai, 603112, Tamil Nadu, India, ametuniv.ac.in.
Mohmed Isaqali KarobariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India, saveetha.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-9695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biodentine, an innovative biocompatible, tricalcium cement, is used widely in endodontics owing to its advantageous properties. Yet limitations concerning its radiopacity and other handling properties have compelled the development of different material modifications. Aim: This scoping review aims to map and synthesize the available evidence on the impact of different fillers and additives on the biological, mechanical, and physical properties of Biodentine in endodontics. Methodology: This review was performed in line with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Modifications for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A Literature search was conducted comprehensively throughout major databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. In vitro studies evaluating the modifications of Biodentine were included. Information was charted and integrated descriptively. Result: Broad range of modifications were noted, such as the addition of nanoparticles, radiopacifiers, bioactive additives. and antimicrobial agents. These modifications were focused on improving the physical and mechanical properties, improve antimicrobial efficacy and enhance radiopacity while preserving biocompatibility. However, significant heterogeneity was noted in modification process, property evaluating methods, and results. Conclusion: This scoping review indicates that modifications of Biodentine using various additives may enhance its biological, mechanical, and physical properties. Future research should focus on standardizing experimental methodologies to allow meaningful comparison across studies, identifying optimal concentrations of additives to balance material performance, and conducting well-designed in vivo and clinical studies to validate these findings and support their translation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

additivebioceramic materialBiodentinebiological propertycalcium silicate cementmechanical propertymodificationnanoparticlephysical propertytricalcium silicate

Identifiers

PMID42317529
PMCPMC13273633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.