ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Modifications of Biodentine and Their Influence on Endodontic Properties: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modifications of Biodentine and Their Influence on Endodontic Properties: A Scoping Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biodentine, an innovative biocompatible, tricalcium cement, is used widely in endodontics owing to its advantageous properties. Yet limitations concerning its radiopacity and other handling properties have compelled the development of different material modifications. Aim: This scoping review aims to map and synthesize the available evidence on the impact of different fillers and additives on the biological, mechanical, and physical properties of Biodentine in endodontics. Methodology: This review was performed in line with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Modifications for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A Literature search was conducted comprehensively throughout major databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. In vitro studies evaluating the modifications of Biodentine were included. Information was charted and integrated descriptively. Result: Broad range of modifications were noted, such as the addition of nanoparticles, radiopacifiers, bioactive additives. and antimicrobial agents. These modifications were focused on improving the physical and mechanical properties, improve antimicrobial efficacy and enhance radiopacity while preserving biocompatibility. However, significant heterogeneity was noted in modification process, property evaluating methods, and results. Conclusion: This scoping review indicates that modifications of Biodentine using various additives may enhance its biological, mechanical, and physical properties. Future research should focus on standardizing experimental methodologies to allow meaningful comparison across studies, identifying optimal concentrations of additives to balance material performance, and conducting well-designed in vivo and clinical studies to validate these findings and support their translation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.