ReviewBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Vitamin D and antimicrobial peptides in skin health and disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential.
Review in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuro-immune-vascular interactions in rosacea and hypertension: a mechanistic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the body's frontline barrier against the external environment, the skin maintains homeostasis through a complex network of innate defense factors, among which antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) play pivotal roles in pathogen defense, inflammation regulation, and tissue repair. Apart from its classical role in bone metabolism, Vitamin D has been shown, mainly in experimental and translational studies, to modulate the expression and processing of selected AMPs through VDR-dependent and non-classical pathways. These findings suggest a possible link between Vitamin D signaling and cutaneous innate immunity. However, the functional consequences of Vitamin D-mediated AMP regulation appear to be highly context-dependent. Evidence from cell-based studies, animal models, human skin samples, and limited clinical studies suggests that this axis may participate in antimicrobial defense, inflammatory regulation, angiogenesis, and tissue repair, but direct clinical evidence demonstrating therapeutic benefit through AMP modulation remains limited and sometimes inconsistent. Finally, building on current evidence, we analyze the limitations of research on the Vitamin D-AMP axis and highlight future directions, including the context-dependent functions of AMPs in diverse skin environments, their interactions with the skin microbiota, and the design and evaluation of translational studies. We argue that this review not only advances our understanding of skin immune mechanisms but also provides valuable insights and references for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.